ZOMBIE FORUMS

It's a stinking, shambling corpse grotesquely parodying life.
It is currently Fri Nov 24, 2017 11:39 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:25 pm 
Offline
Addict
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 3:14 pm
Posts: 2045
Yorik wrote:
cakewalk wrote:
This is a good example of shit post/"logic" as compared to intelligent posting (STILL JUST A THEORY). The idiot in question recognizes that evolution occurs, but it tries to draw a false distinction between the imaginary concepts of macro- and micro-evolution.
LA LA LA LA LA NOT LISTENING LA LA LA LA LA CAN'T HEAR YOU LA LA LA LA.

_________________
All articles that coruscate with resplendence are not truly auriferous.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:49 pm 
Offline
Native
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 5:55 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Brill, Tirisfal Glades
arwing wrote:
I like puppies. Erotically.


TMI?

_________________
Brraaaiiiinnnnnzzzzzz...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: You claim that you don't want to get into this, but then, you brought it up. Taste the pain.
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 12:00 am 
Offline
something smells fishy here
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:30 am
Posts: 119
Yorik wrote:
All theories surrounding evolution or Creation are still just theories. You can gather a mountain of scientific proof for any one theory, and a good portion can be disproved in some manner. Not to mention the other side's going to ridicule it all anyway.

I'm not getting into the whole Evolution vs Creation debate, as I have better things to do. Like read porn. However, my point still stands: this incident is an example of the form of evolution Creationists (and some others) refer to as micro evolution. Even some Fundies (like my parents, for example) can agree upon the existence of adaptation.


Your ignorance of this issue stems from your far deeper and more profound ignorance of science in general. Here's a helpful primer to get you started down the wonderful path of learning:

1. All human knowledge is "just theory." Everything. If you don't believe me, look it up.
2. "Proof" does not exist in a scientific context.
3. Most science does not have "another side." While in many of the more complex and nebulous sciences competing theories can exist side by side, in the case of Evolution, much like gravity or my theory that you will die alone, there is simply the right and the wrong (you).
4. Claiming that people with an obvious and definite anti-science bias and "some others" believe in something does not count as evidence for that something as a scientific theory.
5. You have nothing better to do. Seriously. It's a saturday night, you're a virgin, and you're alone. Your parents won't let you go play video games at your friend's house or drink beer. It's basically this or WoW for you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:51 am 
Offline
Addict
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 12:31 am
Posts: 1587
Location: Bay Area
I wouldn't want to get in a street fight with Cake

_________________
<img src="http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f340/Tossrock/sigreducedjx2-1.jpg">


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:58 am 
Offline
PostWhorePornStar
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2002 5:00 pm
Posts: 10544
Location: Bris-Vegas Australia
Image

The blue bits are where people that don't accept basic science can go and live without ever meeting anyone that might disagree with them.

GO NOW FOR THE GOOD OF THE REST OF US!

Actor.

_________________
"Why can't we go back to living like cavemen? I know it was a rough and ready existence - the men where always rough and the women were always ready! " - Santa.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 3:18 am 
Offline
Green Text

Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 5:00 pm
Posts: 4126
Location: Clouds, rain, and green fields...
This thread is win.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 4:38 am 
Offline
Addict
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 5:00 pm
Posts: 2752
Location: South of the equator
No one loves my Bananaman reference.

Bananaman roxxors.

_________________
UWC: Onion doesn't trust me.

Onion: That's because you're a shifty motherfucker.

UWC: <.<

>.>

<.<

Onion: Fucking precisely you dirty thieving gypsy fuck.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:25 am 
Offline
PostWhorePornStar
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 2:17 pm
Posts: 5981
Location: Around about there.
Urban Wild Cat wrote:
No one loves my Bananaman reference.

Bananaman roxxors.

Everyone was distracted by Serious Business.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:26 am 
Offline
PostWhorePornStar
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2002 5:00 pm
Posts: 10544
Location: Bris-Vegas Australia
/me Eats a Banana.

Actor.

_________________
"Why can't we go back to living like cavemen? I know it was a rough and ready existence - the men where always rough and the women were always ready! " - Santa.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 7:29 am 
Offline
Addict

Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 5:00 pm
Posts: 1654
Location: UrAnus
A quick explanation of scientific Theory for those who fell asleep in every middle and high school science class or were home school by crazy fundamentalist parents.

Scientists work in theories because they leave room for change.


That was my main point, go back and read it until you understand.

If there truly was proof for creationism then science would take that proof and change their theory to incorporate it.

Scientific laws are more of a result of closed minded scientists than the accumulation of proof.
It's really the theory of gravity, not law of gravity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:19 am 
Offline
Addict
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 3:14 pm
Posts: 2045
<iframe src="http://www.timecube.com" width="100%" height="1200"></iframe>

_________________
All articles that coruscate with resplendence are not truly auriferous.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:30 am 
Offline
PostWhorePornStar
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2002 5:00 pm
Posts: 10544
Location: Bris-Vegas Australia
Oh time cube, while I was Admin I tried to make the forum run on your time.

Then reality broke and I had to get Superboy Prime to punch a wall to fix it.

Lots of laughs that was, lots of laughs.

Actor.

_________________
"Why can't we go back to living like cavemen? I know it was a rough and ready existence - the men where always rough and the women were always ready! " - Santa.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:34 am 
Offline
Native
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 5:55 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Brill, Tirisfal Glades
cakewalk wrote:
Yorik wrote:
I am acknowledging your point.

I will continue making it anyway.


I know that "all human knowledge is 'just theory' and 'proof' does not exist in a scientific context". I'm retarded, not an idiot. And the idea that Creationists are anti-scientific stems from your far deeper and more profound ignorance of Creationists in general. Creationism is itself a scientific theory espoused primarily by most of the religious community, such as Christians, Muslims and Jews/Hebrews/whatever their politically correct name is these days. And not even all of the above profess believe in the Creation theory - I've met a number of Christians who believe in Evolution. I've never met one who didn't believe in gravity.

_________________
Brraaaiiiinnnnnzzzzzz...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:43 am 
Offline
PostWhorePornStar
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 2:17 pm
Posts: 5981
Location: Around about there.
Yorik wrote:
Jews/Hebrews/whatever their politically correct name is these days.

Firewood.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:48 am 
Offline
Native
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 5:55 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Brill, Tirisfal Glades
Vass wrote:
Yorik wrote:
Jews/Hebrews/whatever their politically correct name is these days.

Firewood.


I do not live in glorious nation of Kazakhstan.

_________________
Brraaaiiiinnnnnzzzzzz...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:59 am 
Offline
something smells fishy here
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:30 am
Posts: 119
Yorik wrote:
cakewalk wrote:
Yorik wrote:
Here is a sloppy "compromise" because I don't want to argue. Dont you know that evolution is just a theory and all science must be made fun of??
Taste the pain.
D: I said I don't want to argue!

Creation science is, not, in fact, in any way scientific. It is religion wrapped in a child's understanding of scientific process and pushed aggressively by the religious right. There is no good science involved. Fucking zero. This is why it doesn't get taught in schools as science. The reason you have been made to believe otherwise is that evolution represents a direct affront to your worldview and your masters' religious conservative power structure. ID or Creationism as science amounts to nothing less than a calculated attempt to deliver a stinky bullshit burrito to anyone dumb enough to eat it. The idea is to destroy or restructure science to fit into a view of the world would allow for angels and a magical creator father figure. Gravity, interestingly, (miracle?) doesn't really seem to piss God off much, for some reason. In closing, If you continue to believe in ID as science, then you are an idiot. If you are now retarded and you continue to believe in ID as science, then you are a retarded idiot.


Last edited by caekwon on Sun Jul 15, 2007 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 9:00 am 
Offline
Addict
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 3:14 pm
Posts: 2045
Yorik wrote:
Creationism is itself a scientific theory

hey did you see up there?

Where I posted time cube?

_________________
All articles that coruscate with resplendence are not truly auriferous.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 9:18 am 
Offline
Addict

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 5:00 pm
Posts: 3759
Location: your house, your living room, your sofa
Yorik wrote:
cakewalk wrote:
Yorik wrote:
I am acknowledging your point.

I will continue making it anyway.

Creationism is itself a scientific theory espoused primarily by most of the religious community, such as Christians, Muslims and Jews/Hebrews/whatever their politically correct name is these days.


Error.

It is a is a theory. But it is in fact not a scientific theory, based as it is, on the book of genesis and not equations and actual testable, recreatable and peer reviewable substance.

However, it's come to my attention that my theory that you are utterly fucktarded is now held as scientific, given the amount of documentable proof you've left scattered about the place.

_________________
Where in the name of Deus Ex Machina did that T-Rex come from?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 9:27 am 
Offline
Addict
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 3:14 pm
Posts: 2045
onion wrote:
Yorik wrote:
cakewalk wrote:
Yorik wrote:
I am acknowledging your point.

I will continue making it anyway.

Creationism is itself a scientific theory espoused primarily by most of the religious community, such as Christians, Muslims and Jews/Hebrews/whatever their politically correct name is these days.


Error.

It is a is a theory. But it is in fact not a scientific theory, based as it is, on the book of genesis and not equations and actual testable, recreatable and peer reviewable substance.

However, it's come to my attention that my theory that you are utterly fucktarded is now held as scientific, given the amount of documentable proof you've left scattered about the place.
but onion, lots of people believe in Creationism. That's got to make it right!

_________________
All articles that coruscate with resplendence are not truly auriferous.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 9:57 am 
Offline
Addict

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 5:00 pm
Posts: 3759
Location: your house, your living room, your sofa
Let us conduct a small experiment with the google image search function into the nature and proof of gods existence versus the nature and proof of the existence of Charles Darwin:

God (highlights of which being a nebula called the Eye of God by peoeple outside of the scientific community, a picture of Jesus creating many blond women while saying 'Man now I am really weirding myself out' to himself and a charming photographs of two young girls in t shirts espousing the very Christian sentiment of 'GOD HATES FAGS'):
Image

Charles Darwin (mostly containing actual photographs of Charles Darwin and the miraculous appearance of his face inside a tree branch -- IT'S A MIRACLE!!! PRAISE SCIENCE!!!:
Image

Somehow, I think this perfectly illustrates the present discussion...

_________________
Where in the name of Deus Ex Machina did that T-Rex come from?


Last edited by onion on Sun Jul 15, 2007 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group