ZOMBIE FORUMS

Very well then.
Since most of your points during your big rant have been discussed at length in other debates and are easily countered I will not focus on them.Instead I will focus on the two war front debate.

First the forces we have in each hot spot are easily capable of dealing with the forces against them easily or in korea's situation keeping the peace.

In iraq we have a overwhelming advantage over saddam.We have numbers,training,technology,mobility and sheer firepower.We would easily claim control of the open country and skies.The only problem areas would be baghdad.Rooting saddam out of that would be hard and probably the best choice would be to encircle baghdad and wait him out.Now you mentioned you were worried about Saddam using Bio weapons which by the way is a good reason for removing him.First,our troops our trained to deal with these weapons and their effectiveness against soldiers is easily cut down.They would be a threat to civilian areas but we would probably move to fast to allow them any time to deploy weapons like this.

Second North korea.Wackos of course and needing to be dealt with but you are really blowing their threats against the US way out of proportion.First,from what we can tell they can probably squeeze enough out of their nuclear stations to make one bomb.
And from all signs don't have a effective missile that can reach america.


All in all a conflict in Iraq would be over fast and if Korea flares up we can easily deal with them since NK is basically starving itself to death.

On the garrison point only iraq could pose a problem.The Kurds and muslims would be at odds and probably try and get at each other.But again the forces their could handle it on their own.

And if we take down North korea the only thing we will have to worry about is getting enough food to the people fast enough.A steady supply of food would win them over easy.

I disagree with one thing, how many people have we given aid to? How many of them hate us?

Food should, but never does win people over. They always take it like we are patronizing them.

India finally had the decency to ask us to cut it the fuck out because they couldn't get a grain industry going to compete with free grain.

Why is there a mod who's personally involved with one of the forum members? Does the term conflict of interest mean anything to any of you?

I do believe it's time for you to pass the pipe to someone else.

All forum moderators should therefore be forced to live alone on Moderator Island.

*crys* I never knew Moderator Island would be so...so Moderated, or so... Island like... *crys*

god i hate Temptation Island

_________________
ollie.
http://www.drownedinsound.com

"Kill 'em all, let God sort them out. And by the way, God is dead, I killed him first"

Now with 100% added OllieCam

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: ollie on 2003-01-25 12:31 ]</font>

Well, why is that a surprise? If someone's heavily involved in an activity, they're going to want to share it with the people close to them. And anyway, TSC isn't a mod on this forum, only in the SSP and RP forums.

Oy. Good god.

I don't recall correctly, but I think KC has insulted people before, but not quite to that degree.

I have heard that the US is asking for NATO allies, I don't know if they have gotten them yet. I have heard that Germany and France have signed/committed to peace. I have heard there are major concerns with North Korea.

This from a guy that is rather "*shrug* let them all kill themselves and let the survivors sort out the bodies" about it all.

No, it is not a conflict of interest to have someone you love on a forum. What, moderators are supposed to be like robohumans?

And yes, we need more strippers protesting like this. Not just anyone can be nakie. Problem is, most of them are like me. Maybe that could be a pick-up line... hmm...

_________________
Itagaki Yorimitsu
"The secret that is remembered is a blessing. The secret that cannot be forgotten is a curse."

*proudly displays DNI courtesy of the man himself, Michael Poe*

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Itagaki Yorimitsu on 2003-01-26 05:01 ]</font>

Ah. I guess it's not such a problem, then. I was envisioning tSC getting pissed off and banning people, not because they went so far overboard but because they went overboard against somebody he cares about.

Nah, he can't do that here. He won't abuse his powers either. If he feels he's too personally involved in something like that, he'll get one of the other mods to offer opinion.