Abunai! wrote:
I must sadly not advocate the "cut/snip/rip/smash/flog/brand/burn/gnaw/etc their testicle(s) off" for one reason. If we EVER punished the wrong person, how could we live with ourselves? That is my problem with corporal punishment in general, as well.
I could only make one exception: In cases beyond ANY doubt. In those cases: see above.
[randomness]
Has anyone here ever heard the George Carling skit about rape?
Clay, how does your position come out as liberal?
She who stands naked atop a high hill in a lightning storm holding up a metal rod while screaming that all Gods are bastards. (Credit to Jim Bader)
[/randomness]
OK, I believe I said repeat offenders. Framed once, I can believe it, but at that point you should have your back stitched back together and never trust a woman again. Put yourself in another bad situation, Jeeze. Mind you I believe in First and Second degree rape charges.
This is how I'd write the laws:
If you have a first degree rape (i.e. forced violent rape, rape of a pre-menstration child) there will be evidence, vaginal tearing etc. Any doctor can diagnose that, and DNA tests can prove who it was if reported in time. Little room for doubt there. In that case execution is the best answer, people say that then more rapists would murder their victims. I say that in the day of AIDS, all rapes are life threatening. Hard to say, like I say, in a first degree case, I think castration is the answer
Second degree: insufficient consent, possible lack of consent. Including voluntary statutory rape of a teenager, mollestation of a child without clear evidence of penetration. These would be good cases for a good old fasioned British Navy Flogging(tm). If they are innocent, well, that'll teach them not to trust women and to cover their ass. Sex offender registry on first offense would be with the local police only, Stays on their record though.
Another point, if two people get drunk and have sex. the woman says it was rape when she isn't happy about it the next day. If I this happened to someone I knew I would advise him to file a complaint that it was her that raped him and that she was more sober and that he had been taken advantage of. This has ALWAYS bothered me. If two people get drunk and have sex, why is it always the guy's fault. If a woman gives consent under the influence of mind altering substaces THAT SHE KNOWINGLY CHOSE TO DRINK, I would say that this implies a willingness to rely on diminished capacities and live with the consequences. Thousands of drunk driving cases have proven that you can be held accountable for choosing to drink.
"Date-Rape" drugs are another matter entirely. If a person is found possessing GHB or Rohypnol I think it should bump the case up to First Degree, and in the case of GHB, attempted murder. That shit is responsible for well over half of the illegal drug related emergency room cases in America, it can be very dangerous. Next is Extasy-related dehydration and heat stroke, and after that, barbituric acid derivatives (seconal, nimbutol, tuinol). Alcohol-related cases outnumber all of the other drugs put together sever times over.