The Man In Black wrote:
Dumbest. Arguement. Evar. "Oh d00d, just stop arguing for your morality and go with the flow."
I suppose I should clarify since you actually took me seriously. You must be really dull company. Anyways..
By Christianity's standards being an atheist or non-Christian is immoral since you reject Jesus Christ as your savior. Now if they banned all immoral acts by Christian standards I would have no problem with this, however they are not. Atheists are running free through the streets (naked most likely). Hell people are even eating shellfish unrestrained. If all sins are equal in God's eye then why are people so opposed to this one?
EDIT: For the record most Christians (almost all that I have talked to) view the Scriptures as 'God breathed' and inerrant in their original form. Thus they are valid through the ages.
The concept of marraige is hardly a Christian one so that title is not up to them alone to manage. If it were a Christian institution it would be another matter entirely, however it is not, it has existed in virtually every culture in mankind. For this reason it should never be asked of a church to oversee (or whatever you call it) a homosexual marraige.
You need to have show how homosexual marraiges would hurt our society and nation from a secular stance for a law banning them to be upheld. I have no problem with legislating morality, I just have a problem with people being hypocritical and inconsistent about the morality they are legislating.
Finally I don't give a flying fuck what it is called. Nor do I care if queers get to marry. As long as every gets to fuck the brains out of whoever the want to I am cool.
Ever take something I say seriously again and I will kill you MiB.