Jeez, the discussion about objective morals has been done before, give it a rest, guys. All I'll say about it is that you, Kylear, have made a thorough ass of yourself (yeah, you were right about the statistics, but you tried to argue with Icy's cosmics "but"s and "why?"s, and showed yourself [again] to be either highly unimaginative or a troll), and you, Icy, hijacked the thread. Generally, "does" implies a question, "a" is an indefinate article of the English tongue, "dominant" means biggest and most influential, "worldwide" means accross the globe, "culture" means
this, "help" means 'facilitates success in the accomplishment of goals,' and "humanity" means
homo sapientes. There are aggreed upon meanings for most words, and unless the progenitor of the discussion mentions going into cosmic "but"s and "why?"s, it's assumed for the purposes of the discussion that we won't.
Anyway, I'm ambivalent to the idea of a single worldwide culture. The way I see it, the only real advantage a one culture system has is that there's little (read: zero) chance of cultural clash (remember when the Fremen emmissary spits on Leto I's table when he first arrives?), while the advantage of a multi-culture system would be that people would generally recognize that there are other ways of thinking out there. I'm not really equipped to decide which is the better advantage, or postulate other advantages or disadvantages, so I will not make a decision now.
_________________
Quote:
"In real life, you don' have a Subterfuge skill above one." - Phill
"What?! You spent THREE YEARS believing that I didn't masturbate!" - Steven